Intel plans to decrease Ivy Bridge power consumption

Intel-Ivy-Bridge


Intel’s Ivy Bridge negatively surprised customers and reviewers alike with higher than expected operating temperatures when the chips debuted in April 2012. Due to the thermal paste used and the integrated heat spreader Intel Ivy Bridge processors operated at a much higher temperature than the previous Sandy Bridge generation.

This, and the relatively distant launch of the extremely power efficient Intel Haswell processor, has forced Intel to look for ways to decrease the Ivy Bridge CPU power consumption. Intel has not commented on this information but the first Ivy Bridge chips with reduced power consumption are expected in early 2013 with the first one popping up in various tablets including the upcoming Microsoft Surface that will run Windows 8 Professional. Do not expect however to see these chips in desktop computers – Intel will likely use them in tablets and ultrabooks only.

Pricing and a release date have not been announced yet.


Source: Tested.com

Related posts

Logitech outs HD webcam C615

Logitech today rolls out another HD capable webcam for video calls which includes one-click HD video and photo upload to Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. The Logitech HD webcam C615 is capable of  HD 720p video calls on all popular messaging application, features fold-and-go design, autofocus...

Stoney Ridge may be the last Bulldozer-based APU

Stoney Ridge may be the last Bulldozer-based APU

A while ago AMD shared its plans for the so-called Bristol Ridge platform that will succeed the current Kaveri Refresh sometime in 2016. Well, it appears that there will be one more and likely last Bulldozer-based family after Bristol Ridge and it will be called Stoney Ridge. According to...

SuperTalent intros USB 3.0 Express RAM Cache

Super Talent reveals the new “USB 3.0 Express RAM Cachedrive”, which implements a DRAM caching system to boost small block random performance by up to 110x over USB 2.0 speeds. The new patented flash drive measuring 62 x 37 x7.5 mm, has backward compatible with USB 2.0 ports and will be ...

Leave a comment